Document Type : Case Report

Authors

1 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Izhevsk State Medical Academy, Izhevsk, Russia

2 Department of General and Clinical Pharmacology, Izhevsk State Medical Academy, Izhevsk, Russia

3 Department Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

Objective: Ultrasound assessment of inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility is performed to
determine the volume status of critically ill patients. We propose a new acoustic window
for visualizing a vein in a prone patient.
Case Presentation: A healthy volunteer took part in the study. The study protocol includes
two stages: 1) performing a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination to determine
the projection of a certain IVC area on the posterior chest surface (holotopy), 2) performing
an ultrasound scanning in the area of IVC projection in order to identify it and determine
its dimensions.
Conclusion: The 11th intercostal space parallel to the paraspinal line allows to visualize
the IVC in the prone position. This gives a potential opportunity to use it to assess the IVC
collapsibility. Its potential advantage is the ability to assess the compressibility of IVC in
the antero-posterior direction

Keywords

Main Subjects

1. Ilyas A, Ishtiaq W, Assad S, Ghazanfar H, Mansoor S, Haris M, et al. Correlation of IVC diameter and collapsibility index with central venous pressure in the assessment of intravascular volume in critically ill patients. Cureus. 2017;9(2):e1025. doi:10.7759/cureus.1025.
2. Brennan JM, Ronan A, Goonewardena S, Blair JE, Hammes M, Shah D, et al. Handcarried ultrasound measurement of
the inferior vena cava for assessment of intravascular volume status in the outpatient hemodialysis clinic. Clin J Am Soc
Nephrol. 2006;1(4):749-53. doi: 10.2215/cjn.00310106.
3. Stawicki SP, Braslow BM, Panebianco NL, Kirkpatrick JN, Gracias VH, Hayden GE, et al. Intensivist use of handcarried ultrasonography to measure IVC collapsibility in estimating intravascular volume status: correlations with CVP. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.02.062.
4. Fields JM, Lee PA, Jenq KY, Mark DG, Panebianco NL, Dean AJ. The interrater reliability of inferior vena cava ultrasound by bedside clinician sonographers in emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(1):98-101. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00952.x.
5. Massalha M, Faranish R, Romano S, Salim R. Decreased inferior vena cava diameter as an early marker in postpartum
hemorrhage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;59(2):234-40.doi: 10.1002/uog.23695.
6. Clarke J, Geoghegan P, McEvoy N, Boylan M, O NC, Mulligan M, et al. Prone positioning improves oxygenation
and lung recruitment in patients with SARS-CoV-2 acute respiratory distress syndrome; a single centre cohort study of
20 consecutive patients. BMC Res Notes. 2021;14(1):20. doi:10.1186/s13104-020-05426-2.
7. Nasa P, Azoulay E, Khanna AK, Jain R, Gupta S, Javeri Y, et al. Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method. Crit Care. 2021;25(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03491-y.
8. Hensley J, Wang H. Assessment of volume status during prone spine surgery via a novel point-of-care ultrasound technique. Cureus. 2019;11(5):e4601. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4601.
9. Hedman K, Nylander E, Henriksson J, Bjarnegård N, Brudin L, Tamás É. Echocardiographic characterization
of the inferior vena cava in trained and untrained females. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42(12):2794-802. doi: 10.1016/j.
ultrasmedbio.2016.07.003.
10. Ajam M, Drake M, Ran R, Mukundan S, Masri A, Rahmouni H. Approach to echocardiography in ARDS patients in the prone position: a systematic review. Echocardiography.2022;39(2):330-8. doi: 10.1111/echo.15294.